Decision 20509
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 20509 | Reed | English | 1991-10-25 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Returned to a different Board | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| basic concepts | rate of benefit | disqualification |
Summary:
The CEIC takes the position that a 50% reduction in benefits is required by ss.30(6). This is too categorical a view. Ss.30(7) allows the CEIC to determine the number of weeks to which the reduction should be applied. This presumably should vary depending on circumstances.