Decision 20321
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 20321 | Bourgeois | French | 1991-09-05 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| refusal of work | personal convictions |
Summary:
One week exclusion questioned. By reason of the preceding (Supreme Court decision read), I am of the opinion she was justified in refusing to going back to her previous work, i.e. going back to dancing naked at the establishment or bar operated by her employer.