Decision 20275
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 20275 | Jerome | English | 1991-08-22 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | rules of construction | effective date of proviso |
Summary:
As pointed out by the Commission's representative, Parliament did not choose to give s.31(1.2) retroactive application and the conclusion must be that s.31(1.2) specifically changes the law as reflected in the jurisprudence from the effective date of the new provision only.