Decision 20060
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 20060 | Strayer | English | 1991-07-19 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | allocation | normal weekly earnings | vac. pay |
Summary:
Part of the vacation pay was allocated to week ending 7-10 because he had not worked a full week and therefore his actual wages received were less than his normal earnings. Therefore some of the vacation pay could be allocated to that week with the restto the following week.