Decision 19672
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 19672 | Martin | English | 1991-05-23 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| teaching | charter |
Summary:
Claimant argued that reg. 46.1(2)(a) was ultra vires because it was contrary to the purpose and intent of the Act and not within the scope of enabling para. 44(h). Also that it was unconstitutional being contrary to 15(1) of the Charter. Both arguments dismissed.