Decision 19566
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 19566 | Joyal | English | 1991-05-13 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | pension | private plans |
Summary:
The fact that the pension plan is held and administered by a third party is irrelevant. Moreover, the regulation makes no distinctions as to whether payments are derived under private agreement or under public law, or whether they are funded under a contributory scheme.