| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
loss of employment |
terminates during strike |
|
Summary:
Claimant says that he should not have been penalized for accepting temporary work. The provisions of ss.31(1) apply to employment. They do not distinguish between temporary or permanent employment.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
regularly engaged |
definition |
|
Summary:
Temporary work lost due to strike. Mere availability for work in another sector is not sufficient to prevent the disentitlement. Provision is made in ss.31(1) for removing the disentitlement upon one obtaining insurable employment but not on account of his being available for it.
