Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
earnings |
income |
paid or payable |
|
Summary:
Vacation pay due in 1-90 as per the collective agreement but paid upon layoff in 11-89. The Regulations only require that the money be "paid" or "payable", and therefore it is not necessary to consider the effect of the word "payable".
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
earnings |
vacation pay |
by reason of lay-off or separation |
|
Summary:
Even if I accepted that the employer should have waited until 1-90 and not pay vacation pay on layoff in 11-89, the date of receipt is not material. The money, even if not received on layoff, would have been "payable" in the future in respect of a layoff. 58(13)(b) would apply.