| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| refusal of work |
neglect to avail |
|
|
Summary:
The Board's decision alludes to a requirement that an actual offer of work be extended to claimant. Para. 27(1)(b) not to be confused with 27(1)(a). A job offer need not be made under 27(1)(b), so long as an "opportunity" of suitable employment is available to claimant.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| refusal of work |
teaching |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant did not attempt to return to her position following maternity leave until 1 month later, the start of 2nd term. The difficulty she would experience setting exams and marking students she had not taught if she returned early does not constitute good cause.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| refusal of work |
personal constraints |
after confinement |
|
Summary:
Teacher who waited until start of 2nd term, 1 month later, to return to her job. I suggest that an effort to find work in one's own job would be a reasonable action for one desirous of obtaining work. Her failure to pursue this option was not reasonable.
