| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
constitution of board |
member ineligible |
|
Summary:
The procedural irregularity consists of having appointed the same Board to hear claimant's case after that Board had ruled against him once before in his absence not having received adequate notice of the hearing.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
natural justice |
notice of hearing |
|
Summary:
Did not receive adequate notice of hearing. Case reheard by same Board. First decision to be treated as a nullity and case to be heard de novo. Board misled as to its powers and procedure: the CEIC submitted that the decision could not be varied unless new facts brought forward.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
new facts not required |
|
Summary:
Did not receive adequate notice of hearing. Case reheard by same Board. First decision to be treated as a nullity and case to be heard de novo. Board misled as to its powers and procedure: the CEIC submitted that the decision could not be varied unless new facts brought forward.
