| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
contradictory |
|
Summary:
There is no such hard and fast rule entitling anyone to apply "more credence to the first statement" automatically. There could well be reasons of intimidation, inducement, conflict of personalities which could invest the subsequent statement with the greater credibility.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
warning before disentitlement |
|
Summary:
It may be noted that a warning to the claimant that benefits may be suspended because of non-availability is not mandatory in cases where the claimant has admitted to not actively searching for employment, according to CUB 17482.
