Decision 18180
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 18180 | Reed | English | 1990-07-09 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| availability for work | job search | warning before disentitlement |
Summary:
If properly disentitled because she moved to Tumbler Ridge, a warning would serve no purpose and I cannot think it would be necessary, because the only way of re-entitling herself to UI would be for her to move out of there. This hardly seems a likely course of action for her.