Decision 18093
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 18093 | Strayer | English | 1990-06-06 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| availability for work | applicability | non-working days |
Summary:
It should be noted that the absence of claimant from his residence on 19-7-86 and 18-7-87 could not in law justify a finding that he was not available. Each of those days was a Saturday. According to the definition of "working day" in reg. 45, Saturday is not a working day.