Decision 18013

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 18013   Joyal  French 1990-05-11
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties  proof  need for an explanation 

Summary:

The insured has the opportunity to explain himself before the Board, to refer to simple mistakes or errors in calculation, not to prove that he is not guilty but to contradict conclusions in fact. If these explanations raise reasonable doubt, the penalty must be cancelled. False or erroneous statements do not raise presumption of guilt but impose an obligation on the part of the claimant to provide some explanation failing which CEIC is entitled to declare them made knowingly simply because of the fact that they are false.


Date modified: