Decision 17911
Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Decision 17911 | Reed | English | 1990-03-30 |
Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
---|---|---|---|
Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
---|---|---|---|
basic concepts | rate of benefit | computation |
Summary:
Claimant worked full-time several years. He quit to attend university and obtained work at lesser rate. He contends he would have received a higher rate had he applied for UI without delay, that he should not be penalized for accepting work. No discretion to depart from statute.