| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
eligibility to hear case |
|
|
Summary:
At the same time as this appeal, claimant is bringing an action in the Federal Court, Trial Division. I am of the view that I am unable to act as an Umpire under the UI Act and a Judge of the Federal Court at the same moment.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
legal remedy |
|
Summary:
GRANGER quoted. Equity has no place in the face of the clear and peremptory provisions of the law. If the claimant has been aggrieved his remedy is to be had in the Federal Court and not on an appeal to the Umpire.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
charter arguments |
|
Summary:
Claimant argues that repayment of the overpayment following a clear error by CEIC results in an infringement of his s.7 Charter rights. Argument dismissed because "security of the person rights" in s.7 does not include the protection of economic rights.
