Decision 17817
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 17817 | Jerome | English | 1990-02-16 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | income | elected or appointed representative |
Summary:
Claimant says that, since Revenue Canada ruled that a contract of service does not exist, monies received are not earnings. Reg. 57 appears to make it clear that income received as alderman, which entails an implied contract, constitutes earnings. So held by jurisprudence.