Decision 17641

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 17641   Dubé  French 1990-01-16
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Allowed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties  proof  need for an explanation 

Summary:

True that burden of proof falls on shoulders of the claimant, once error demonstrated by CEIC, to prove he did not commit error intentionally to mislead. As statement was false, he had to provide reasonable explanation which he did.


Date modified: