Decision 17510
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 17510 | Martin | English | 1990-01-03 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | pension | charter |
Summary:
Discrimination alleged and case law referred to holding that statute requiring judge to retire at 70 is of no effect. UI Regulation based on the fact that one is a pensioner, not on age. Also the requalifying clause in 57(3)(j) is not based on age but on employment.