| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision not to reconsider |
|
Summary:
Claimant started to work in real estate in 5-86. Notice sent to her in 6-87 saying disentitled from 5-87. Board upheld disentitlement from 5-86. Claimant argues that 5-86 was not an issue. CEIC alleges typographical error and correct date is 5-86. Held that Board erred in law.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
errors in law |
excess of jurisdiction |
|
Summary:
Claimant started to work in real estate in 5-86. Notice sent to her in 6-87 saying disentitled from 5-87. The Board upheld the disentitlement from 5-86. Claimant argues that 5-86 was not an issue. The CEIC alleges typographical error and that correct date is 5-86. Held that the Board erred in law.
