Decision 17502
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 17502 | Martin | English | 1990-01-03 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | special reasons | change in jurisprudence |
Summary:
It will generally follow that the longer the delay in filing the appeal the heavier will be the burden on the appellant. The fact that later jurisprudence might have given rise to a different decision is not a special reason for extending the delay from2 to 32 months.