| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
authority to review |
new facts vs reconsideration |
|
Summary:
The Commission may not consider the same facts anew and modify its prior decision. From the outset, it was aware of the severance pay received by claimant and decided to grant him UI. It could not subsequently annul its decision unless there are new facts or evidence of an administrative error.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
income |
nature of monies |
|
Summary:
The arbitration decision did not affect the nature of severance pay claimant received. He did not receive any additional salary. He received an indemnity equivalent to his salary, not a salary. The severance pay already received did not, for that simplereason, become a salary.
