Decision 17295
Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Decision 17295 | Jerome | English | 1989-11-21 |
Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
---|---|---|---|
Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
---|---|---|---|
earnings | vacation pay | specific period |
Summary:
Though the Memorandum of Settlement deems that employees took full remaining vacation entitlement during the stoppage, this period does not constitute a specific vacation period. Not genuinely on vacation at that time. Reg. 58(13)(a) cannot apply here.