| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
oath of employment |
|
|
Summary:
Hired in 1980 and verbally informed of requirement of signing oath. Letter sent in 1985 and again in 1987. Warned in 3-87 and given until 7-87 to sign. Charter argument raised but no specific sections mentioned. 3-week disqualification restored.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
refusal to obey orders |
|
|
Summary:
The Commission is correct that a claimant's continued refusal to comply with his employer's legitimate and reasonable request is misconduct. The key words are "legitimate and reasonable". One must also act as a reasonable person would.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
errors in law |
misinterpretation of provision |
|
Summary:
The Board erred in law in ruling that the oath violated the claimant's Charter rights in the absence of specific sections of the Charter and applicable jurisprudence being before it.
