Decision 17132
Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Decision 17132 | Teitelbaum | French | 1989-10-18 |
Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
---|---|---|---|
Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
---|---|---|---|
board of referees | special reasons | definition | time to appeal to bor and Umpire |
Summary:
After receiving the decision and consulting CEIC, she decided not to appeal. The fact that she later obtained a different opinion telling her that she should have appealed does not constitute a special reason affecting the 10-month delay.