| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
warning before disentitlement |
|
Summary:
Jurisprudence has required that claimants should receive a warning when they have persisted in restricting their job search too much for too long. Not required by legislation but by simple fairness. Reasonable opportunity to be given to bring one withinthe new conditions.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
restrictions |
part-time work |
employed |
Summary:
Would not accept other work in preference to part-time job held. No job search. As per jurisprudence, the Board must consider whether he was assured a recall and how long it would have been reasonable for him to wait for that recall before looking for other work.
