| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
business |
|
|
Summary:
It is clear from the case law that there must be a deliberate intent to deceive. Here, claimant did not receive any remuneration from his self-employment and did not consider it to be "work". He considered his statements true, so he did not know them tobe false.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
time limitation for recovery |
|
Summary:
The Commission cannot invoke the 72-month period referred to in ss.35(4) as it has not established that claimant knowingly made false statements, given my finding on this issue. Refer to MARTEL (T-2416-87).
