Decision 16915

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 16915   Teitelbaum  English 1989-08-25
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Allowed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work  job search  warning before disentitlement 

Summary:

Disentitled after 4 months: too restrictive. She was not given any warning. When she got a notice of disentitlement, she broadened her availability. She should have been given a 4-week period to remove restrictions. Error in law in not considering absence of warning.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees  errors in law  availability concept 

Summary:

Disentitled after 4 months: too restrictive. She was not given any warning. When she got a notice of disentitlement, she broadened her availability. She should have been given a 4-week period to remove restrictions. Error in law in not considering absence of warning.


Date modified: