Decision 16677
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 16677 | Jerome | English | 1989-06-16 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| availability for work | job search | warning before disentitlement |
Summary:
I am concerned that recent jurisprudence requiring that claimants be warned of disentitlement unless the job search is broadened was not considered. But as claimant's availability is definitely restrictive, the decision should not be retroactive and is varied accordingly.