Decision 16654
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 16654 | Reed | English | 1989-06-12 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| week of unemployment | business of a spouse |
Summary:
There is abundant evidence supporting the conclusion that the claimant was working in his wife's video store on a significant and substantial basis. Whether he received any direct remuneration is not determinative of a decision that he was engaged in a co-adventure.