Decision 16653
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 16653 | Reed | English | 1989-06-12 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| labour dispute | loss of employment | by reason of a stoppage |
Summary:
Claimant says the Board applied the wrong test. It found the loss of employment was as a result of a labour dispute rather than as a result of a stoppage of work due to the dispute. It is clear the loss occurred because of the cessation of the operations due to the dispute.