Decision 16554
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 16554 | Walsh | English | 1989-05-12 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| basic concepts | insurability | number of weeks | maximum |
Summary:
Claimant has 9 instead of the 10 weeks required. His employment in week 14-9 covered 2 pay periods. Week defined in UI Act. One cannot be credited for 2 insured weeks in one week even if he had 2 pay periods in it.