Decision 16365
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 16365 | Denault | French | 1989-03-31 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| antedate | qualifying conditions | interruption of earnings |
Summary:
The insured must prove that he fulfills the required conditions and that he had sufficient motive to justify the delay. No interruption of earnings starting in 6-85 since he was on paid leave. The interruption of earnings only occurred in 1-87. He was clearly not entitled to antidating.