Decision 16296
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 16296 | Dubé | French | 1989-03-15 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| misconduct | criminal acts |
Summary:
Having been accused of theft, he alleges that nothing was proven and that the Board should have waited for the results of the police investigation. Proof beyond all reasonable doubt is not required, the weight of evidence is sufficient. Insufficient proof in the file. Not necessary to wait.