Decision 16240

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 16240   Teitelbaum  English 1989-03-07
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
sickness benefits  expiration of sickness benefits 

Summary:

Collected regular UI for 16 weeks and sickness UI for 9 weeks. Advised 2 months late her entitlement to sickness UI had expired. Her treatment was elective and had she known she would not be entitled to UI she would have made herself available for work.It remains she was not.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work  applicability  Commission allegedly at fault 

Summary:

Advised 2 months late that her entitlement to UI sickness had expired. Her treatment was elective and had she known she would not be entitled to UI she would have made herself available for work. This may be so. It remains that she was not available.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work  incompatible situations  health reasons 

Summary:

Advised 2 months late that her entitlement to UI sickness had expired. Her treatment was elective and had she known she would not be entitled to UI she would have made herself available for work. This may be so. It remains that she was not available.


Date modified: