Decision 16219
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 16219 | McNair | English | 1989-03-06 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| availability for work | job search | as a requirement |
Summary:
The law is clear that the onus rests on the claimant of proving availability and the mere statement that one is available falls short of the proof required. Job search activity is required for proof. A full-time course affects availability.