| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
errors in law |
attending classes |
|
Summary:
Left teaching work to be closer to university. The courses required him to attend 6 hours a week but on 4 separate mornings. He said he would be available when not attending classes. The Board gave proper effect to the well established presumption. No error in law.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
employment left |
|
Summary:
The claimant did state he would be prepared to leave the course if suitable work found but that is a statement of questionable credibility considering he had left his employment to return to university to complete the courses required for his degree.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
purpose of the legislation |
|
Summary:
Time and time again students have argued that by attending university they are bettering themselves and making themselves more employable, that system encourages them to do nothing and receive UI. Those arguments have not prevailed simply because UI notintended to students.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
time required for studies |
|
Summary:
Left teaching work to be closer to university. The courses required him to attend 6 hours a week but on 4 separate mornings. He said he would be available when not attending classes. The Board gave proper effect to the well established presumption. No error in law.
