Decision 16075

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 16075   Reed  English 1989-01-17
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work  incompatible situations  layoff requested 

Summary:

The work was not steady and when there was no work claimant sought UI. He requested time off because he was building a house for himself. Employer agreed provided claimant would accept to work if it became busy. This he did on odd days over the 7-week period. No error by Board.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work  applicability  necessary conditions 

Summary:

Not enough to have paid premiums and be out work, one must also be available. This implies a willingness to work under normal conditions, a sincere desire to work accompanied by personal efforts to find work. Burden on proof on claimant.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work  applicability  definition 

Summary:

Not enough to have paid premiums and be out work, one must also be available. This implies a willingness to work under normal conditions, a sincere desire to work accompanied by personal efforts to find work. Burden on proof on claimant. [layoff requested by claimant]


Date modified: