Decision 16061

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 16061   Reed  English 1989-01-16
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Allowed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work  incompatible situations  health reasons 

Summary:

The requirement in 14(a) that a claimant must be capable for work refers to physical capability in the sense of being physically well or not being subject to some restraint which makes the person unable to work.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work  applicability  definition  incapacity 

Summary:

The requirement in 14(a) that a claimant must be capable for work refers to physical capability in the sense of being physically well or not being subject to some restraint which makes the person unable to work.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
umpires  grounds of appeal  capricious finding  req'd 

Summary:

Claimant's statement that he looked for work while attending full-time courses accepted by the Board. I have absolutely no doubt that I would not have come to the same conclusion. Nevertheless, I cannot reach a conclusion that that finding was made in aperverse or capricious manner.


Date modified: