| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not a ground of entitlement |
|
Summary:
It is alleged that claimant was told by UI staff he could receive UI while taking the course. Even if he had been misled by an employee, that would not by itself qualify him for UI: the mistake of an employee does not create a right under the law.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
extent of availability required |
|
Summary:
Merely being available for weekends and evenings does not constitute availability. No indication claimant would have abandoned his studies to accept work. The intention of a claimant to really discontinue his course so as to accept work is a very important criterion.
