| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
natural justice |
free of bias |
|
Summary:
A litigant is entitled to have his case adjudicated by a tribunal whose mind is free from bias, not having pre-judged the matter before the appellant even sets foots in the hearing room.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
applicability |
maternity leave |
|
Summary:
Teacher on a 1-year leave of absence due to the possibility of severe hypertension developing in the course of pregnancy. The law does exact reasonable foresight to avoid dangers and pitfalls which can be reasonably anticipated.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification |
length |
|
Summary:
It has been noted time and again in Umpires' decisions that where Parliament provides a maximum period of disqualification, it is to be imposed only in the most egregious of cases. Here it is clear that claimant's conduct was far from flagrant. 1-week disqualification is enough.
