Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
stoppage of work |
premises |
|
Summary:
Claimant's employer was not a party to the dispute but a contractor for CIP who was represented by Forest Industrial Relations. Claimant was a union member. Laid off 18-7-86. Not recalled 18-8 because employer perceived a dispute at "his" workplace (union's patrol boats).
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
loss of employment |
prior to stoppage |
|
Summary:
Seasonal layoff 18-7-86. Expected recall 18-8-86. Not recalled by reason of strike. Claimant's employer was not a party to the dispute but a contractor for CIP who was represented by Forest Industrial Relations. Claimant was a union member. No error of law by Board.