| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
factors to consider |
|
Summary:
Attendance at a course is prima facie evidence of non-availability, but not automatic grounds for disentitlement. Factors to be examined: claimant's intention in case of job offer, amount of tuition, nature of course, purpose of taking course, job search.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
disentitlement not automatic |
|
Summary:
Attendance at a course is prima facie evidence of non-availability, but not automatic grounds for disentitlement. Factors to be examined: claimant's intention in case of job offer, amount of tuition, nature of course, purpose of taking course, job search.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
natural justice |
defined |
|
Summary:
Although one has the right to present his case and the right to hear and respond, once sufficient notice of hearing has been given, claimant's failure to appear is not a breach of rule and Board is entitled to proceed in his absence.
