| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
absences from home |
out of canada |
|
Summary:
Claimant presented Commission with full details of his 2-week stay in Los Angeles including names of 20 firms contacted with a view to becoming their representative in Canada. Evidence that he was misinformed by Commission staff before leaving.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not a ground of entitlement |
|
Summary:
There is evidence that he was misinformed by the Commission staff before going to California for 2 weeks. According to GRANGER, the Umpire must apply the law and the Commission is bound by the law notwithstanding any commitments to the contrary.
