| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
observations from the Commission |
|
|
Summary:
To submit selectively slanted jurisprudence is highly improper and unfair, since almost all referees are not lawyers, as all claimants are not lawyers. Mild presumption of lack of objectivity because author of the observations is also author of the notice of disqualification.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
from employer |
|
Summary:
An employer is not entitled to be presumed more credible than an employee. Credibility is to be found upon the material before the Board. Neither side starts with any favourable or unfavourable presumption of credibility.
