| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
jurisdiction |
charter |
|
Summary:
His powers sitting as an Umpire are merely as the ZWARICH case decided to find whether the sections of the legislation impugned as being contrary to Charter are of no force and effect, but not to pronounce a declaration as to constitutional validity of the statute.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
pension |
charter |
|
Summary:
Military pensions. Alleged that selection of the 5-1-86 date is discrimination. This is to state that the predecessor regulation must remain in effect in perpetuity. I cannot so conclude. No discrimination or unequal treatment under Charter.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
rules of construction |
intent and object |
|
Summary:
As pointed out in a recent case, even the Supreme Court of Canada may not question the wisdom of enactments nor adjudicate upon the merits of basic policies.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
pension |
military forces |
|
Summary:
Military pensions. Alleged that selection of the 5-1-86 date is discrimination. This is to state that the predecessor regulation must remain in effect in perpetuity. I cannot so conclude. No discrimination or unequal treatment under Charter.
