Decision 15138A
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 15138A | Bourgeois | English | 1990-09-26 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| basic concepts | insurability | notice pay |
Summary:
Claimant had 17 instead of the 20 required insured weeks. She alleges that the 6 weeks pay in lieu of notice should be considered as insurable earnings, thus crediting her with an additional 6 weeks of insurable employment.