| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| refusal of work |
warning prior to disentitlement |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant felt he was never given any information about ss.40(3) which states one might have to accept lower wages after some time of unemployment. There is no duty on the Commission to provide that information to any claimants. Law has been this way formany years.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
constitution of board |
member ineligible |
|
Summary:
Claimant suggests that there is some element of unfairness in Boards being appointed and paid by the Commission. I do not accept that argument. No evidence that this Board was predisposed in favour of the Commission rather than the claimant.
