| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
dual self-employment |
|
|
Summary:
The Board concluded that the cumulative effect of the 2 occupations brought claimant within reg. 43(1) as working a full working week... I regret being unable to find the kind of error under s.95 which would justify my intervention.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
grounds of appeal |
capricious finding |
req'd |
Summary:
Borderline case. The facts available to the Board were such that either conclusion could have been reached. So long as the conclusion is not perverse or capricious, the Umpire cannot intervene, even if the Umpire, on the very same facts, might have reached a different conclusion.
