| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
error by board |
|
Summary:
Decision set aside under 80(a) because the Board acted beyond its jurisdiction. It decided a question which was not before it. It decided that claimant had quit his job without just cause whereas the decision was that he had refused a job.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
from employer |
|
Summary:
I found statements of claimant to be confusing, to be viewed with caution due to self-interest. Those from former employer are relatively clear and no motive of self-interest. No apparent history of tension which would lead employer to give an unfavourable account.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
statement of facts |
as a requirement |
|
Summary:
The Board said that after reviewing the file it was unanimous that claimant left his job without just cause. The Board did not comply with ss.79(2) since there is no statement of findings in this decision. Decision might well be set aside on this ground.
